语言与文风2020hemingwayapp.com
海明威编辑器：让文字更简洁有力
Hemingway Editor
导读
这组讨论围绕 Hemingway Editor 这类"写作检测工具"展开：评论者亲自把海明威自己的名篇喂给软件测试，结果被标红标黄，由此引出核心争议——机器能识别长句、被动语态等表层特征，却读不懂节奏、语境与意义。对写作者而言，这是一次很好的提醒：把这类工具当诊断仪而非指挥棒，别为了通过检测而牺牲文字的气息与个人语感。
可以直接用的写作要点
- 01
把语法检测工具当"诊断仪"而非"指挥棒"：参考它标出的问题，但不要逐条照改，否则会丢掉好文字应有的节奏。
- 02
句子的长短要服务于节奏和强调：海明威也会故意用一个110词的长句制造顿挫，长句不是原罪，失控才是。
- 03
写作好坏取决于语境和读者：商务邮件、技术文档、随笔的标准不同，别用同一把尺子量所有文本。
- 04
警惕被工具训练成"机器腔"：不要一味堆砌复杂词汇来显得专业，练习"像说话一样写作"往往更有效。
HN 评论精选
工具把海明威原文判为不合格，说明它不懂节奏，只能当参考。
我把海明威自己的短篇《一个干净明亮的地方》的开头拿去测试。警报！大师开篇就是一个110词、两句话的段落，第一句被标黄，第二句被标红。按软件的标准，海明威本人的写作都有问题。这工具用得得法，是不错的诊断帮手；但如果你让它决定每一处改动，就会失去好文字完整的节奏。即便是极简写作的大师，也知道何时该把句子拉长一点，制造出让人意外又着迷的韵律。
GCA10查看英文原文
Couldn't resist the temptation. I grabbed the opening paragraph of Hemingway's own short story "A Clean, Well-Lighted Place" -- and put it to the test. Danger alert! Danger alert! The master himself opens with a 110-word, two-sentence paragraph. The first sentence is flagged yellow. The second one is flagged red. By the software's system, Hemingway's own writing is in trouble. Truth is, this app is a nifty diagnostic tool that will help you avoid some writing goofs, if you use it judiciously. But if you let it dictate every change, you'll lose the full rhythms of good writing. Even a master of lean writing (Hemingway himself) knew when to bulk up, even for just a moment, to create a cadence that could surprise and intrigue us.
写作标准取决于语境与读者，工具应提供洞察而非下命令。
英语是我的第二语言，学得较晚。好文章不是文本自身的固有属性，而是在"信息与读者"的语境中定义的。这个产品是给谁用的？商务邮件、技术文档、技术书还是学校作文？同一篇文章里风格通常也不统一，引言和旁注往往比正文更随意。用同一套写作标准要求所有文本，等于把平庸当成美德。我更希望工具不是告诉我该怎么做，而是只提供对文本的洞察——借助 AI 对情感、文风和多种复杂度指标的洞察，可以用来服务这个工具的同样目标，还能做更多。
lykahb查看英文原文
The English language is my second language that I learned quite late. I appreciate its beauty with all quirks and complexity. Good writing is not an intrinsic property of the text - it is defined within a context of message and reader. Who is this product for? Business correspondence, tech specs, technical books, or school essays? The style is usually not consistent throughout the same text. Intro or side notes are often less formal than the body. Applying the same standard of writing to all texts preaches mediocrity as a virtue. I would prefer a tool that instead of telling me what to do, would only offer insights into the text. With AI's insights of sentiment, writing style, and several metrics of complexity, one could use that guidance for the same goals as this app and many more.
工具连语法都判断错，且写作的核心是意义而非句法。
用句法机器来教人写作的趋势让我困惑，因为写作首先关乎意义。比如《葛底斯堡演说》开头那句："Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation...can long endure." Hemingway 把它标为被动语态，但它其实是现在进行时结构。计算机不是让我们更像人，而是努力把我们变得像机器，这令人担忧。
wcarey查看英文原文
The trend towards using syntactic machines to teach people to write perplexes me because writing is foremost about meaning. For example, the Gettysburg address begins: > Now we are engaged in a great civil war, testing whether that nation, or any nation so conceived and so dedicated, can long endure. Hemingway flags that as passive voice, but it's actually a present progressive construction. Rather than computers making us more fully human, they strive to make us more machine like, and that's a worry.
工具会长期塑造写作习惯，警惕用复杂词掩盖不自信。
我以前用过类似的编辑器，后来不用了。但我发现这类工具的训练方式有长期影响：我的一位新同事总爱挑最复杂的词，也许是冒名顶替综合征、需要过度补偿，也许他从未体会过简单用词的好处。希望更多人学会"像说话一样写作"这门手艺。
lemax查看英文原文
I have used similar editors in the past and since stopped. But, I found that the way these tools tend to train you to write has a long term impact. One of my newer colleagues often seems to choose the most complex words possible. I'm not sure if it's an imposter syndrome thing, maybe they feel the need to overcompensate, or they actually never learned the benefits of simpler word choice. I wish more people would learn the art of Writing Like You Talk. http://www.paulgraham.com/talk.html
同类还值得读
像说话一样写作
Write like you talk
这篇短文主张写作应像说话一样自然、清晰，避免装腔作势的书面腔。
语言与文风2015 · 647 分 · 272 评4 条写作要点编辑精选法律语言难懂源于写作不佳，而非专业概念
Poor writing, not specialized concepts, drives difficulty with legal language
这是一项认知科学研究：法律文本难懂，主要不是因为充斥专业术语，而是因为写作者把句子写得又长又绕、修饰语层层嵌套、回指距离过远。
语言与文风2022 · 559 分 · 322 评5 条写作要点编辑精选写得简单
Write Simply
保罗·格拉汉姆在这篇短文里主张：好文章应该写得简单——用日常词汇、短句、直白的结构，不为显得聪明而堆砌复杂表达。
语言与文风2021 · 484 分 · 330 评4 条写作要点编辑精选Tortured phrases：科学写作中出现的一种可疑文风
Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science
《自然》新闻报道了一种在科学论文中蔓延的怪现象：原本标准的术语被同义替换软件改写成了古怪说法，比如把 "cloud computing" 写成 "haze figuring"。
语言与文风2021 · 329 分 · 256 评4 条写作要点编辑精选乔治·奥威尔 1940 年对《我的奋斗》的书评
George Orwell's review of Mein Kampf (1940)
这是奥威尔1940年对《我的奋斗》的书评。
语言与文风2014 · 305 分 · 240 评4 条写作要点编辑精选