HN 写作课

工程师们二十年里聊过的写作。

工程师、作家、编辑和创业者在 Hacker News 上聊了二十年“怎么写”:怎么写得清楚、怎么讲好一个故事、技术文档怎么写、小说和出版是怎么回事。这里把其中关于写作与讲故事的帖子挑出来,配上中文导读、可以直接用的写作要点和评论翻译。

从必读开始
  • 2,600+篇关于写作的 HN 讨论

Writing tips

写作锦囊

正在抽一条写作要点…

Essential

必读 30 篇

在讨论库里看全部精选

编辑精选里 HN 讨论最热的 30 篇,每篇都有中文导读和写作要点。

  1. 正在载入…

Archive

讨论库

按发帖年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些讨论是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      从全量里捞

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部帖子,用关键词先捞出 40 分以上、可能和写作有关的约 1.1 万篇。

    2. 02

      只留真正讲写作的

      由 AI 逐条判断是否和写作、讲故事、文风、出版有实质关系,剔除“写代码”“编辑器”这类字面撞车,并分进十个类别。

    3. 03

      提炼可用的要点

      为值得读的帖子写中文导读,提炼 2-4 条可以直接用到自己写作里的要点,并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。内容由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    语言与文风2015medium.com编辑精选

    如今我们都在这样写作

    That Way We’re All Writing Now

    阅读原文 HN 讨论
    68HN 得分
    41条评论
    4条写作要点

    导读

    文章讨论互联网时代一种新的写作方式:用梗图、固定句式和极简句法,把私人瞬间写成可共享的普遍情绪。对写作者来说,它既展示了句法实验如何承载反讽、羞耻与共鸣,也提醒模板化表达会磨平经验的独特性。读它可以更自觉地判断:自己是在创新语气,还是在重复现成情绪。

    关键词 网络写作句法演化情绪表达模板化表达

    可以直接用的写作要点

    1. 01

      写个人体验时,先抓住具体、独特甚至尴尬的细节,再让共鸣从特殊性中自然产生,而不是直接套用“大家都懂的瞬间”。

    2. 02

      把省略、错序、故意误拼、/s 这类句法标记当作语气工具:每次使用都要问它增加了什么情绪或反讽,而不是成为新的模板。

    3. 03

      观察网络梗时,不只复制句式,拆解它省略了什么、强调了什么,再把这套节奏用进自己的句子。

    4. 04

      警惕“普遍化感受”的舒适感:如果一句话能被百万条帖子替换,它可能没有写出你真正的经验。

    HN 评论精选

    模板化写作把个体感受普遍化,容易磨平独特性,让私人交流变成文化工业流水线。

    “它让你的感受显得普遍”——这句话普遍化的是写作者自己的感受,不是读者的。就像宗教或有效利他主义,同质化传播(表情包、暴走漫画、“那一刻……”句式)是另一种把个体性交给“伟大普遍”的愉悦。它强调经验中共同、易消化的一面,而非独特、特殊、古怪的一面。具体触发经验是什么并不重要;传达的情绪是百万人早已感受过的。文化工业不再从上方强加,我们的私人交流已成文化工业,我们是维持它运转的劳工。

    Jimmy查看英文原文

    >It makes your feeling seem universal It universalizes the feeling of the writer, not the reader. Much like religion or the Effective Altruism movement, the rise of homogenized communication (image macros, rage comics, the "that moment when..." style of writing), is yet another way of obtaining the pleasant feeling of subjugating your individuality to the Great Universal. This style of communication emphasizes what is common and easily digestible about an experience, rather than what is unique, particular, peculiar. The fact that the token experience varies from communication to communication - Tinder swipes one moment, getting your class canceled the next - is irrelevant. The only emotion communicated is one that has been felt a million times before by a million people. The Culture Industry [1] no longer needs to be imposed upon us from above. Our private communications have become the Culture Industry, and we are the army of laborers that keep it running. [1] http://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Culture_industry

    网络梗和句法实验是语言创新的引擎,写作者可观察其表达情绪的新方式。

    喜欢这段:网络像寒武纪爆发,诞生大量“长触手的语言生命体”;如今人们写的字远多于前互联网时代,实验量巨大;看文字游戏以大肠杆菌速度进化是时代乐趣。多数句法变形梗是在找表达感受的新巧方式。贴图论坛看似幼稚胡闹,却证明是新文化和新语言的引擎。

    duncanawoods查看英文原文

    I liked this. Particularly: I’m a fan of all the betentacled linguistic lifeforms that have emerged from our cambrian explosion online. These days, people write insanely more text than they did before the Internet and mobile phones came along. So the volume of experimentation is correspondingly massive and, for me, delightful. One joy of our age is watching wordplay evolve at the pace of E.coli. and Most of these syntax-morphing memes consist of us trying to find clever new ways to express our feelings. The effect of image boards really is fascinating. What at first seemed to be childish screwing around is proving to be an amazing engine of new culture and language. such wow

    句法演化——省略、错序、标记——是写作者主动增加反讽和情绪层次的工具。

    受 Pinker、McWhorter 等语言学家影响,我认为这是为传达意义和情绪而发生的句法演化;不只是大小写、标点,还包括奇怪词序、故意省略、故意拼错。不同意用文化工业解释;人们是通过新句法渠道分享额外含义(情绪、反讽)。例如写反讽:1)明标签“(刚才那是反讽)”;2)HTML 标签 <sarcasm>;3)/s;4)省略语法“Because jobs.”。这种减法制造突兀感,传达愚蠢或荒谬。

    jasode查看英文原文

    I've been convinced by linguists (Steven Pinker, John McWhorter, etc) that it looks like evolution of syntax to convey meaning and emotions. Syntax evolution isn't just introduction of old ideas like lowercase+uppercase, Capitalization rules, punctuation (spaces between words, periods & commas to mark rests & beats, etc). Syntax evolution also includes new strange word reorderings, deliberate word omissions, and deliberate word misspellings. I disagree with the other comment about The Culture Industry as an explanation. That's not relevant. Instead, people are trying to share extra meaning (emotion, irony, etc) through extra channels of new syntax manipulation. Let's say a writer wants to be sarcastic when writing out bad reasoning. Examples: Congress keeps buying tanks the Army does not need. Why? 1) explicit labeling of concept with backreference: "It's good because it maintains jobs. (That was sarcasm.)" 2) HTML tag inspired syntax: "<sarcasm>It's good because it maintains jobs.</sarcasm>" 3) /s (inspired by Unix command line switch?) "It's good because it maintains jobs. /s" 4) grammar incorrect because of missing words "Because jobs." (It's as if the general public is creating syntax options in English to parallel the computer language verbosity of Objective-C and Java EE to terseness of Perl and Haskell.) That type of word subtraction creates an interesting abruptness that conveys to the reader a meaning of idiocy or lunacy. Similar phrases can be constructed like "because freedom" or "because science". Why is the TSA now performing mandatory cavity searches of preschoolers? "Because freedom." The substraction of words may have been motivated by the mechanics of 2 thumbs typing on smartphones or the Twitter 140 char limit but I think even desktop users with 100wpm typing speed have adopted it.

    互联网把私密微小羞耻变成共同经验,写作可从具体小尴尬中建立共鸣。

    暴走漫画、从句、FML 帖子、推文、匿名评论等,让分享从未说出口的微小瞬间更容易;然后大家意识到自己都能共鸣。秘密的微小羞耻披露成为现代人类经验的常见部分。

    vatys查看英文原文

    > It makes your feeling seem universal. Rage comics, subordinate clauses, FML postings, tweets, anonymous comment threads, etc. The internet makes it easier to share the kind of tiny moments you'd never speak of. Then, suddenly, we all realized that we could all relate to them. Secret micro-shame revelation becomes a commonplace part of the modern human experience. Isn't the internet wonderful?

    同类还值得读

    1. 像说话一样写作

      Write like you talk

      这篇短文主张写作应像说话一样自然、清晰,避免装腔作势的书面腔。

      语言与文风2015 · 647 分 · 272 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    2. 法律语言难懂源于写作不佳,而非专业概念

      Poor writing, not specialized concepts, drives difficulty with legal language

      这是一项认知科学研究:法律文本难懂,主要不是因为充斥专业术语,而是因为写作者把句子写得又长又绕、修饰语层层嵌套、回指距离过远。

      语言与文风2022 · 559 分 · 322 评5 条写作要点编辑精选
    3. 写得简单

      Write Simply

      保罗·格拉汉姆在这篇短文里主张:好文章应该写得简单——用日常词汇、短句、直白的结构,不为显得聪明而堆砌复杂表达。

      语言与文风2021 · 484 分 · 330 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    4. Tortured phrases:科学写作中出现的一种可疑文风

      Tortured phrases: A dubious writing style emerging in science

      《自然》新闻报道了一种在科学论文中蔓延的怪现象:原本标准的术语被同义替换软件改写成了古怪说法,比如把 "cloud computing" 写成 "haze figuring"。

      语言与文风2021 · 329 分 · 256 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    5. 乔治·奥威尔 1940 年对《我的奋斗》的书评

      George Orwell's review of Mein Kampf (1940)

      这是奥威尔1940年对《我的奋斗》的书评。

      语言与文风2014 · 305 分 · 240 评4 条写作要点编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。