HN 写作课

工程师们二十年里聊过的写作。

工程师、作家、编辑和创业者在 Hacker News 上聊了二十年“怎么写”:怎么写得清楚、怎么讲好一个故事、技术文档怎么写、小说和出版是怎么回事。这里把其中关于写作与讲故事的帖子挑出来,配上中文导读、可以直接用的写作要点和评论翻译。

从必读开始
  • 2,600+篇关于写作的 HN 讨论

Writing tips

写作锦囊

正在抽一条写作要点…

Essential

必读 30 篇

在讨论库里看全部精选

编辑精选里 HN 讨论最热的 30 篇,每篇都有中文导读和写作要点。

  1. 正在载入…

Archive

讨论库

按发帖年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些讨论是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      从全量里捞

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部帖子,用关键词先捞出 40 分以上、可能和写作有关的约 1.1 万篇。

    2. 02

      只留真正讲写作的

      由 AI 逐条判断是否和写作、讲故事、文风、出版有实质关系,剔除“写代码”“编辑器”这类字面撞车,并分进十个类别。

    3. 03

      提炼可用的要点

      为值得读的帖子写中文导读,提炼 2-4 条可以直接用到自己写作里的要点,并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。内容由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    出版与作家生涯2015washingtonpost.com

    白人迈克尔因诗作无法发表,便化名“Yi-Fen Chou”

    White guy named Michael couldn’t get a poem published so he became Yi-Fen Chou

    阅读原文 HN 讨论
    52HN 得分
    16条评论
    4条写作要点

    导读

    这篇帖子讲述一位白人诗人以本名屡遭拒稿,改用中文笔名后作品得以发表,引发关于文学出版中身份、笔名与作品评价的争议。对写作者而言,它提醒我们作品被拒可能无关质量,而涉及行业偏见;也促使我们思考笔名策略与市场接受度对创作的影响。

    关键词 笔名策略身份政治文学出版写作偏见

    可以直接用的写作要点

    1. 01

      作品被拒未必是质量不够,有时是作者身份标签在起作用,写作者应理性看待拒稿并区分文本问题与行业偏见。

    2. 02

      笔名或身份包装可能影响发表机会,但核心仍是作品内容,慎用投机策略以免遮蔽真正的写作成长。

    3. 03

      出版方基于作者背景而非文本评判是行业问题,写作者可主动了解规则,但不必为了迎合而扭曲自我表达。

    4. 04

      艺术市场接受度会影响创作选择,写作者需要在自我表达与市场认可之间找到平衡,而非单纯追逐发表。

    HN 评论精选

    问题不在作者改名,而在出版方以作者名字而非作品质量作评判。

    评论者解读张教授的话:她认为少数族裔是因作品质量而发表,暗示他们因少数族裔身份才发表是对其作品不能独立成立的侮辱。但这位白人并未发表种族主义言论,他只是证明中国名字确实影响了发表。所以若说侮辱,那是出版方的侮辱,因为他们基于作品之外的东西评判。

    jawns查看英文原文

    "He sort of implies that minorities are published because we're minorities, not because of our work. That's just insulting." What Prof. Chang means by this is that she believes minorities are published because of the quality of their work, and anyone who suggests that they're published simply because they're minorities is wrong and motivated by a belief that minorities' work does not stand on its own merits, which would indeed be insulting. If this white guy announced, "I'm going to use a Chinese-sounding pen name because I think it'll make my poems more likely to be published," then yeah, I think a case could be made that it's insulting, because he would be presuming that minorities' work does not stand on its own merits. But in this case, the white guy did not make a racist statement. What he did was demonstrate that in at least one case, the Chinese-sounding name did influence whether his poems were published. So, if it's insulting, it's insulting not because of what this man said or did. Rather, it's insulting on the part of the publications, who did judge the poems on something other than their merits.

    行业偏见可能以意想不到的方式运作,名字或身份标签会扭曲发表结果。

    奇怪的是,一位批评者认为“传统特权”阶层成员冒充弱势阶层是错误的,尽管迈克尔的本名作品一直被拒。仿佛在诗歌界,中文名字成了特权,而白人美国人反而受歧视——可人们却以为情况相反。

    Asbostos查看英文原文

    Strangely one of the critics considered it wrong that a member of a "traditionally privileged" class pretended to be a member of a less favored class. That despite the fact that Michael's work was consistently rejected under his own name. Apparently in poetry, Chinese is a privileged class and white Americans suffer discrimination yet people believe it's the other way around.

    名字与作品内容无关,评判者的偏见才是问题所在。

    我不明白为什么他们说他种族主义——他不是那个根据作者名字评判诗歌的人。名字与内容无关。

    snarfy查看英文原文

    I'm not sure why they are calling him racist - he's not the one judging poems based on author name. The name is not relevant to the content.

    艺术界存在为迎合市场而改变身份包装的现象,写作者需警惕市场对创作的塑造。

    这并不奇怪。多年前我做艺术装置时,遇到过几个美国人改名字和口音,让自己听起来像德国人或北欧人,以便被更认真地对待并卖出更多画廊作品。这招对他们管用。但这和我那位用美国名字的中国同事有何不同?或者和 Häagen-Dazs 想被当作异国冰淇淋品牌有何不同?艺术从来只取决于市场能接受什么。

    ap22213查看英文原文

    This isn't so surprising. Quite a few years ago (when I was doing art installations) I met a couple people (Americans) who had changed their names and accents to sound German or Nordic so that they'd be taken more seriously (and sell more gallery art). Apparently, this had worked for them. But, is it all so different from my Chinese co-worker who refers to himself by his American name? Or, perhaps even the chain Häagen-Dazs that wanted to be considered as an exotic ice cream maker to the average American? Art is (and has always been) only what the market will bare.

    同类还值得读

    1. 写书:值得吗?

      Writing a book: is it worth it?

      Martin Kleppmann(《设计数据密集型应用》作者)复盘写书到底值不值:金钱回报低、耗时极长,但带来了可见度、信任和职业机会。

      出版与作家生涯2020 · 642 分 · 287 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    2. 写书并不是个好主意

      Writing books is not really a good idea

      这篇文章讨论靠写书谋生的现实难度,评论区从版税数学、收入预期和写作目标三个角度补充了作者视角。

      出版与作家生涯2021 · 577 分 · 609 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    3. 如何自助出版一本书:实用资源清单

      How to self-publish a book: A handy list of resources

      这是一份关于「如何自助出版一本书」的资源清单帖,涵盖从编辑、排版到 ISBN、销售渠道的实操工具与花费。

      出版与作家生涯2018 · 558 分 · 88 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    4. 我自助出版一本Ruby on Rails书,赚了7万美元

      How I Made $70k Self-Publishing a Book about Ruby on Rails

      这是一篇 Ruby 开发者自述:他把一套 Rails 性能课程(书+视频+答疑)自出版,一年毛收入约 7 万美元,并总结了选题、定价、营销等经验。

      出版与作家生涯2017 · 539 分 · 175 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    5. 石黑一雄警告年轻作家因“恐惧”而自我审查

      Sir Kazuo Ishiguro warns of young authors self-censoring out of 'fear'

      石黑一雄提醒年轻作者因“恐惧”而自我审查,即这条帖子讨论的核心。

      出版与作家生涯2021 · 396 分 · 641 评5 条写作要点编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。