写作与思考2010alexkrupp.typepad.com
写作如何创造价值
How writing creates value
导读
这篇文章探讨写作如何创造价值，核心观点是写作应聚焦于传递洞察和思维方式，而非堆砌事实。对写作者而言，它提醒我们好文章的价值在于提供可迁移的认知框架，并尝试引入新概念来激发读者兴趣。
可以直接用的写作要点
- 01
写作时聚焦于提供洞察和思考方式，而不是罗列易过时的事实，因为思维方式更持久、可迁移。
- 02
尝试在文章中引入新概念或新颖视角，这能让内容更有趣、更有价值。
- 03
写作的价值在于帮助读者建立认知框架，而非提供短暂的信息。
HN 评论精选
写作应聚焦洞察和思维方式，因为事实易变，而思考方式更持久。
文章有趣，但寻找算法引擎识别优质内容的理由有点牵强。更简单的方法是利用人们已有的评分（书评、链接、论坛讨论、投票等）。我喜欢关于聚焦洞察的部分，并认为这是少数可迁移的技能之一——事实虽然有趣但脆弱，而思考世界的方式更持久。
kalid查看英文原文
Interesting article, though I think the rationale (find an algorithmic engine to identify quality content) a bit forced. Solving that problem seems similar to building an AI capable of interpreting what a human being would think. Far simpler is to use ratings people already have (book reviews, links to sources they like, forum discussions, up/down votes, etc.) and highlight those. For example, you could look at the top 100 hacker news links each month and get a large amount of insight/interesting stories/. I think people enjoy browsing, discovering and voting -- I'm not sure I'd really want a machine that just gave me the most interesting links (hn services as that, with the added gem of perhaps discovering something off the beaten path). I did like the part about focusing on insight, and calling that out as a specific trait. I find that is one of the few transferrable skills -- facts, while interesting, are fragile; ways of thinking about the world can be more permanent.
文章的有趣程度可以通过是否引入新概念来衡量。
这让我想到，如果概念依存理论能提取结构化信息，就可以衡量文章是否因引入新概念而有趣。
mark_l_watson查看英文原文
This gave me an idea: decades ago I became interested in a natural language processing theory known as Conceptual Dependency Theory (never was very useful to me though, and I was like a dinosaur caught in a tar pit: my fascination with the theory kept me in a stuck state). Anyway, CDT attempts to extract structured information from text and I thought that if CDT worked, then you could measure something Alex talked about in the article: rating text as interesting if it introduced novel concepts.
同类还值得读
不要想好再写，要写来思考
Don’t think to write, write to think
这篇短文主张不要把写作当成思考完成后的记录，而要把写作本身当作思考的工具：动笔的过程会逼出想不清楚的地方。
写作与思考2022 · 553 分 · 145 评4 条写作要点编辑精选写作即思考：学会自信地写作
Writing Is Thinking: Learning to Write with Confidence
这是一篇讲“写作即思考”的博客：作者认为写作不是把想好的东西誊写出来，而是借助写作本身把想法想清楚，因此写作者应当建立信心、敢于先写烂稿。
写作与思考2019 · 529 分 · 83 评4 条写作要点编辑精选如何用写作来思考
How to think in writing
这篇文章讨论的是「用写作来思考」：作者认为写作不只是把想清楚的东西表达出来，更是想清楚本身的工具——文字落在纸上，你才有机会看见自己思路里的跳跃、含混和漏洞。
写作与思考2024 · 424 分 · 120 评4 条写作要点编辑精选写作，帮你逃离默认的人生设置
Write to Escape Your Default Setting
文章的核心主张就写在标题里：写作是帮你逃离「默认设置」的手段——日常的思维和表达都有惯性默认的默认模式，而落笔能逼你跳出来，重新看清自己到底在想什么、要说什么。
写作与思考2025 · 407 分 · 93 评4 条写作要点编辑精选写作就是思考
Writing is thinking
文章以“写作即思考”为题，讨论写作不只是把已有想法记录下来，而是帮助澄清、组织和推进思考的过程。
写作与思考2025 · 330 分 · 128 评4 条写作要点编辑精选