HN 写作课

工程师们二十年里聊过的写作。

工程师、作家、编辑和创业者在 Hacker News 上聊了二十年“怎么写”:怎么写得清楚、怎么讲好一个故事、技术文档怎么写、小说和出版是怎么回事。这里把其中关于写作与讲故事的帖子挑出来,配上中文导读、可以直接用的写作要点和评论翻译。

从必读开始
  • 2,600+篇关于写作的 HN 讨论

Writing tips

写作锦囊

正在抽一条写作要点…

Essential

必读 30 篇

在讨论库里看全部精选

编辑精选里 HN 讨论最热的 30 篇,每篇都有中文导读和写作要点。

  1. 正在载入…

Archive

讨论库

按发帖年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些讨论是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      从全量里捞

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部帖子,用关键词先捞出 40 分以上、可能和写作有关的约 1.1 万篇。

    2. 02

      只留真正讲写作的

      由 AI 逐条判断是否和写作、讲故事、文风、出版有实质关系,剔除“写代码”“编辑器”这类字面撞车,并分进十个类别。

    3. 03

      提炼可用的要点

      为值得读的帖子写中文导读,提炼 2-4 条可以直接用到自己写作里的要点,并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。内容由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    写作与思考2017newyorker.com

    个人随笔的繁荣已经结束

    The Personal-Essay Boom Is Over

    阅读原文 HN 讨论
    77HN 得分
    55条评论
    4条写作要点

    导读

    这篇文章讨论个人散文热潮的兴起与退潮,分析其背后的媒体生态、写作门槛与内容质量问题。对写作者来说,它提醒我们:个人化写作容易陷入自我沉溺和套路化,好文章需要更广阔的视角和编辑打磨。

    关键词 个人散文写作门槛内容质量编辑

    可以直接用的写作要点

    1. 01

      个人化写作容易沦为自我沉溺,选题时要警惕视角的狭窄性。

    2. 02

      写作门槛低不等于容易写好,多数个人散文读起来像情绪宣泄,需要编辑打磨。

    3. 03

      警惕把个人经历写成套路化的“申请文书”式文章。

    4. 04

      内容生产受商业驱动时,要守住质量底线,避免成为“文学版真人秀”。

    HN 评论精选

    个人散文容易沦为特定阶层的自我沉溺,选题视角狭窄。

    这篇元文章回避了更大的图景。“个人散文”似乎是“第一世界女权问题”的委婉说法:例子都是富裕女性渲染琐碎的女性问题,没有男性或下层阶级的对应例子。性侵散文有真诚有用的,也有利用他人受害经历自我拔高的。作者不承认这一点,可能因为她受雇于 Jezebel。我个人欢迎这种变化,因为西方上层阶级总在把注意力从穷人转向自己。

    briholt查看英文原文

    This is an interesting meta article, but it skirts the bigger picture. "Personal essay" seems to be a euphemism for "first world feminist problems." Note all of the examples in the intro are wealthy(ish) women drumming up trivial problems somehow related to womanhood. There are no listed examples of men having equivalent problems (let's say having a mishap with his pant zipper), and there are no listed examples of lower class problems (let's say a dishwasher who gets type 2 diabetes). The sexual assault essays go both ways - some are genuine and useful to understanding crime, some are authors desperately exploiting other people's victimhood for their own self aggrandizement ("stare rape"). The author's failure to acknowledge the topic of the personal essay boom may stem from her own employment at Jezebel, a publication largely devoted to first world feminist problems. Personally, I welcome this change. I've been very disheartened by what has been an obvious attempt at the Western upper classes to redirect money attention away from the needy and towards themselves. Sadly, I've seen a fair share of this on HN as well.

    个人散文门槛低导致质量参差,好文章需要编辑打磨,但热潮本身有价值。

    个人散文热潮才刚开始,人们在分享有趣的东西。问题在于任何人都能写,导致95%以上读起来像幼稚日记、情绪宣泄,或没有作者以为的那么有趣。信号噪音比一直是问题,需要文字编辑和出版物来打磨。我自己的 Medium 上最受欢迎的就是个人散文,主题是电影、音乐、写作,而不是以卫生棉条为透镜的生活评论。

    6stringmerc查看英文原文

    Completely false, very narrow minded perspective that pretty much works backwards from its conclusion using lots of anecdotes. The Personal-Essay Boom is just getting started, because now people are sharing more interesting things in more interesting ways in the past. Dishing on former employers. Describing personal journeys. Letting people experience a slice of life that they otherwise would not come across. The only problem with Personal-Essays is that anybody without any training or practice can sit down and give it a try, which is why 95%+ will read like a Sophomoric diary entry based on literary merit (if lucky) or Ranting (overloaded with emotions), or just not as interesting as the Writer thinks. So, to contrast the anecdotes and conclusion I disagree with in the article, I will happily cite that on my Medium.com page, where I have 70 publications, the highest viewed, most shared, and apparently most liked are Personal Essays. They are about interesting subjects - Film, Music, Writing - not, as the Writer uses as a comparison - some kind of nuveau-critique about life as told through the lens of a Tampon. The signal to noise ratio has always been a problem. That's the role of Copy Editors (RIP, really they're seemingly extinct in the US outside of Top 1%) and Publications to get things into shape. Or, to re-frame the discussion in terms of guitar and me experience with it, "Anybody can pick up a guitar and make noise, but making beautiful music is going to take a lot of time and effort." Personal Essays also follow this axiom.

    个人化写作的盛行与应试训练有关,容易套路化。

    我想知道这是否与教育趋势有关。我这一代在高中英语课上似乎只学了怎么写大学申请文书,越个人化越好。

    douche查看英文原文

    I wonder if it has something to do with trends in education. It seems like the only thing my generation ever did in high school English classes was learn how to write college application essays, the more personal, the better.

    同类还值得读

    1. 不要想好再写,要写来思考

      Don’t think to write, write to think

      这篇短文主张不要把写作当成思考完成后的记录,而要把写作本身当作思考的工具:动笔的过程会逼出想不清楚的地方。

      写作与思考2022 · 553 分 · 145 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    2. 写作即思考:学会自信地写作

      Writing Is Thinking: Learning to Write with Confidence

      这是一篇讲“写作即思考”的博客:作者认为写作不是把想好的东西誊写出来,而是借助写作本身把想法想清楚,因此写作者应当建立信心、敢于先写烂稿。

      写作与思考2019 · 529 分 · 83 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    3. 如何用写作来思考

      How to think in writing

      这篇文章讨论的是「用写作来思考」:作者认为写作不只是把想清楚的东西表达出来,更是想清楚本身的工具——文字落在纸上,你才有机会看见自己思路里的跳跃、含混和漏洞。

      写作与思考2024 · 424 分 · 120 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    4. 写作,帮你逃离默认的人生设置

      Write to Escape Your Default Setting

      文章的核心主张就写在标题里:写作是帮你逃离「默认设置」的手段——日常的思维和表达都有惯性默认的默认模式,而落笔能逼你跳出来,重新看清自己到底在想什么、要说什么。

      写作与思考2025 · 407 分 · 93 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    5. 写作就是思考

      Writing is thinking

      文章以“写作即思考”为题,讨论写作不只是把已有想法记录下来,而是帮助澄清、组织和推进思考的过程。

      写作与思考2025 · 330 分 · 128 评4 条写作要点编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。