HN 写作课

工程师们二十年里聊过的写作。

工程师、作家、编辑和创业者在 Hacker News 上聊了二十年“怎么写”:怎么写得清楚、怎么讲好一个故事、技术文档怎么写、小说和出版是怎么回事。这里把其中关于写作与讲故事的帖子挑出来,配上中文导读、可以直接用的写作要点和评论翻译。

从必读开始
  • 2,600+篇关于写作的 HN 讨论

Writing tips

写作锦囊

正在抽一条写作要点…

Essential

必读 30 篇

在讨论库里看全部精选

编辑精选里 HN 讨论最热的 30 篇,每篇都有中文导读和写作要点。

  1. 正在载入…

Archive

讨论库

按发帖年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些讨论是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      从全量里捞

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部帖子,用关键词先捞出 40 分以上、可能和写作有关的约 1.1 万篇。

    2. 02

      只留真正讲写作的

      由 AI 逐条判断是否和写作、讲故事、文风、出版有实质关系,剔除“写代码”“编辑器”这类字面撞车,并分进十个类别。

    3. 03

      提炼可用的要点

      为值得读的帖子写中文导读,提炼 2-4 条可以直接用到自己写作里的要点,并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。内容由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    出版与作家生涯2020movieweb.com

    《星球大战》知名图书作者称迪士尼拖欠其四年版税

    Iconic Star Wars Book Author Claims Disney Owes Him 4 Years of Overdue Royalties

    阅读原文 HN 讨论
    180HN 得分
    41条评论
    4条写作要点

    导读

    这篇报道讲的是《星球大战》小说化作者 Alan Dean Foster 向迪士尼追讨四年未付版税,Hacker News 的讨论则从这条新闻延伸到"雇佣作品"(work-for-hire)合同、版权归属和作者如何维权。对写作者来说值得一读,因为它提醒我们:写作收入真正由合同条款决定,名气不是决定因素,而标题怎么措辞、权利怎么登记,都会影响你日后能不能拿到钱。

    关键词 版税合同雇佣作品作者维权标题写作

    可以直接用的写作要点

    1. 01

      签约前先弄清是"雇佣作品/一次性买断"还是"保留版权、按销量抽版税",这一条决定你以后还能不能持续分钱。

    2. 02

      影视小说化、IP 衍生类写作大多是固定稿酬,不要把它当成可以长期依靠的收入来规划生活。

    3. 03

      写标题时注意归因:是"某人声称被欠款"还是"某公司欠款",一字之差就决定报道是否失实。

    4. 04

      一旦发现版税被拖欠,尽快找律师处理,因为诉讼时效可能正在逼近。

    HN 评论精选

    影视小说化多为雇佣作品,版权和版税归雇主,作者只拿一次性稿酬,查版权登记即可验证。

    如前一个帖子所说,电影小说化几乎都是"雇佣作品":作者拿固定稿酬,可能另有销量奖金,但不享有版税。在雇佣作品安排下,作者受托写作,雇主拥有版权,也就拥有授权、再版等收益。70 年代末、80 年代初的福克斯以对创作者友好的合同著称(比如允许卢卡斯保留《星球大战》),但卢卡斯影业几乎不可能以雇佣作品之外的方式雇用 ADF。事实上,《斯普林特的心灵之眼》的版权登记显示,版权归"Star Wars Corporation"所有,属"雇主雇佣";《异形》小说化的登记同样显示为雇佣作品。作为对比,原创作品如约翰·斯卡尔齐的《老人的战争》,版权申请人是作者本人。

    gamblor956查看英文原文

    As noted in the prior thread, movie novelizations are almost always work-for-hire jobs, meaning that the authors are not entitled to royalties but get paid a fixed amount and may receive sales-based bonuses. (In a work-for-hire arrangement, the author is commissioned to write something, and the employer owns the copyright and thus also the royalties for licensing, republication, etc.) While 70s/early 80s era Fox was known for its artist-friendly legal deals (see, e.g., letting Lucas keep Star Wars), it would have been extremely unusual for Lucasfilm to have hired ADF on anything but a WFH basis. And indeed, the copyright record for the novel Splinter of the Mind's Eye shows that the "Star Wars Corporation" owns the copyright, not ADF, and was an "employer for hire." (https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=4&ti=1,4&Search%5FArg=splinter%20of%20the%20minds%20eye&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=eUEI6XpLoh-dSbNmN9csfcmClE&SEQ=20201123130607&SID=1) On that note, the copyright registration for Aliens (the novelization) also shows that it was a work-for-hire. https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=65&ti=51,65&Search%5FArg=aliens&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=blZQ0xAz5o8w78oItM-KWOs57nF&SEQ=20201123130945&SID=7 (Contrast to an original work, where the author is the copyright claimant: John Scalzi's Old Man's War https://cocatalog.loc.gov/cgi-bin/Pwebrecon.cgi?v1=2&ti=1,2&Search%5FArg=old%20man%27s%20war&Search%5FCode=TALL&CNT=25&PID=7gUlzJ90NZH2vT18FOhVImCLB_g&SEQ=20201123131312&SID=12) In other words, ADF is not being denied royalties. He wasn't owed any in the first place, unless he somehow negotiated a non-standard WFH agreement that almost nobody in the industry gets. (ADF was a big name for sci-fi novelizations back in the day, so it's possible that he did have such an arrangement, but if that's the case he needs to show that he has that type of contract.) EDIT: grammatical fixes and added links EDIT 2: Note that the SFWA has unilaterally made claims about what they think Disney is trying to do (acquire assets without the corresponding liabilities). This claim would be correct if, as ADF claims, he owned the copyrights to the novelizations or his WFH agreement somehow obligated Fox/Lucasfilm to pay him royalties. But otherwise it's simply wrong, and Disney itself has never actually made statements to that effect. Moreover, such a claim would not comport with how M&A works in the U.S.

    版税被拖欠要立刻行动,诉讼时效不等人。

    如果被欠钱超过两年,就马上找律师,别等到下个月,今天就去他们的办公室。诉讼时效的期限很可能正在逼近。

    sandworm101查看英文原文

    I you are owed money for 2+ years, talk to a lawyer asap. Not next month. Go to their office today. There are statute of limitation deadlines that are likely approaching.

    标题里谁主张、谁欠钱,这种措辞会直接影响读者对事实的判断。

    我不是律师,但在我看来,更准确的标题应该是"迪士尼欠这位《星球大战》标志性图书作者四年的逾期版税"。

    hairofadog查看英文原文

    I’m no lawyer, but from my perspective a more accurate headline would be “Disney owes iconic Star Wars book author 4 years of overdue royalties”.

    同类还值得读

    1. 写书:值得吗?

      Writing a book: is it worth it?

      Martin Kleppmann(《设计数据密集型应用》作者)复盘写书到底值不值:金钱回报低、耗时极长,但带来了可见度、信任和职业机会。

      出版与作家生涯2020 · 642 分 · 287 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    2. 写书并不是个好主意

      Writing books is not really a good idea

      这篇文章讨论靠写书谋生的现实难度,评论区从版税数学、收入预期和写作目标三个角度补充了作者视角。

      出版与作家生涯2021 · 577 分 · 609 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    3. 如何自助出版一本书:实用资源清单

      How to self-publish a book: A handy list of resources

      这是一份关于「如何自助出版一本书」的资源清单帖,涵盖从编辑、排版到 ISBN、销售渠道的实操工具与花费。

      出版与作家生涯2018 · 558 分 · 88 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    4. 我自助出版一本Ruby on Rails书,赚了7万美元

      How I Made $70k Self-Publishing a Book about Ruby on Rails

      这是一篇 Ruby 开发者自述:他把一套 Rails 性能课程(书+视频+答疑)自出版,一年毛收入约 7 万美元,并总结了选题、定价、营销等经验。

      出版与作家生涯2017 · 539 分 · 175 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    5. 石黑一雄警告年轻作家因“恐惧”而自我审查

      Sir Kazuo Ishiguro warns of young authors self-censoring out of 'fear'

      石黑一雄提醒年轻作者因“恐惧”而自我审查,即这条帖子讨论的核心。

      出版与作家生涯2021 · 396 分 · 641 评5 条写作要点编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。