小说与文学2022pairagraph.com
谁说得对：奥威尔还是赫胥黎？
Who Got It Right: Orwell or Huxley?
导读
这是 Dreher 与 Winegard 围绕「谁说得对：奥威尔还是赫胥黎」展开的一场对谈——即《1984》的强制压迫与《美丽新世界》的娱乐麻醉，哪一种更能描述当下。值得写作者读，是因为它示范了「用一个经典二分法搭框架」的写法：好处是读者一秒入场，风险是框架可能只是挂自己真实论点的衣架。
可以直接用的写作要点
- 01
用「A 还是 B」的经典二分法开场能迅速抓住读者，但要在文中交代清楚：这个框架是为了照亮问题，还是只为自己预设的结论当衣架。
- 02
把抽象论点落到一个具体意象或场景上（如「安抚奶嘴 vs 鞭子」），比直接下判断更有说服力，也更易被记住。
- 03
与其只写人们如何反应，不如追问「掌权者为什么这样做」，把因果链条往前推一层，文章会显得更有解释力。
- 04
用一个精确的历史事例（如德国的「密封列车」送列宁回国）替代泛泛而论，可以让原本宏大的论断变得可检验。
HN 评论精选
警惕把经典二分法当成幌子，用来偷渡自己真正的政治主张。
这两个人其实彼此同意，只是借「赫胥黎 vs 奥威尔」这场假想辩论当衣架，挂上自己真正的论点——德雷尔想推销的是一种类似匈牙利欧尔班政府所追求的社会图景，温加德大概是想谈取消文化。这并不妨碍人们就赫胥黎与奥威尔做一场好奇而深思的辩论，但我不认为这两位作者真的在辩论。
tptacek查看英文原文
These are two people who agree with each other, using a supposed debate about Huxley and Orwell as a coat rack on which to hang their real arguments --- in Dreher's case, for a vision of society resembling what Orban's Fidesz is pursuing in Hungary, and in Winegard's, I assume something about cancel culture. Doesn't mean you can't have a curious and thoughtful debate about Huxley and Orwell here, but I don't think the authors are really having one.
「安抚」比「镇压」更稳定，因为它让被统治者互相监督；这是解释性写作的好模型。
两种元素都存在于现代世界，但赫胥黎式的那一种更容易被忽视。掌权者需要人们对不可容忍的事大体上不作反应，而用毒品、玩具、安抚奶嘴去安抚人，比用鞭子更好，因为被安抚的人会反过来施压别人「别搅局」；被鞭打的人则会向朋友抱怨，并试图组织抵抗。当然真要用鞭子时，你会把它「新话」成别的说法，小剂量也管用；问题在于一旦升级，公关就压不住了。所以《1984》式社会是亚稳态的，确实会沸腾溢出；《美丽新世界》式社会是稳定的，对很多人不可见，不过我猜还有某种我们尚未见到的失效模式——也许有人就是厌倦了一切都被公关揉搓致死，于是做点什么。
lordnacho查看英文原文
Elements of both exist in the modern world, but Huxley's is easier to overlook. Authorities need people to mostly not react to intolerable things that are happening, and it's best if you do it from placating people with drugs/toys/pacifiers rather than the whip, because people who are pacified will pressure other people into not rocking the boat, whereas people who are being whipped will complain about it to their friends and try to build up a resistance movement. Of course when you do go for the whip, you want to newspeak it into something else, so that also works, in small doses. Your problem occurs if it escalates, then you can't hold it down with PR anymore. So 1984 is metastable and such societies did in fact boil over. BNW is stable and invisible to a lot of people, though I suspect there is some failure mode we have yet to see. Maybe there's a line of thought where people just get sick of every damn thing being massaged to death by PR people, and they do something about it.
把提问从「人们如何反应」转向「谁在施加、为何施加」，论证会更有深度。
奥威尔 vs 赫胥黎，其实是一面看人们如何回应「被施加之事」的透镜。我更感兴趣的是：掌权者最初为什么要做这些事。文章把学生说成拥有权力的一方，我不这么认为，他们只是被困在系统里，做出任何年轻人在同样处境下都会做的反应。我最喜欢的例子是德国人用外交「密封列车」把列宁从瑞士送回俄国：俄国革命是心怀算计的德国人有意促成的一次行动，他们准确预期结果会有利于自己打赢战争。剩下的就是历史了。
cjbgkagh查看英文原文
Orwell vs Huxley seems to be the lens of how people react to what is done to them. I'm more interested in why those in power do those things in the first place. The article points to the students as if they have power, I don't think they do, they're trapped in a system and reacting to it as pretty much any young human would do in the same position. Possibly my favorite example of the powerful impressing a way of life on a huge number of people is the diplomatic sealed train the Germans used to send Lenin from Switzerland to Russia. i.e. the Russian Revolution was an intentional act done to it by cynical Germans who correctly expected the outcome would help them in the war. And the rest is history.
一张对照图往往比长篇论述更快传达一个论点。
尽管我知道它受到过批评，我一直很喜欢麦克米伦为波兹曼《娱乐至死》画的那幅视觉化对照漫画。
maurits查看英文原文
Although I understand its been critiqued, I always liked the visual depiction of "amusing ourselves to death" from Postman [1], by McMillen [2] [1]: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Amusing_Ourselves_to_Death [2]: https://biblioklept.org/2013/06/08/huxley-vs-orwell-the-webcomic-2/
同类还值得读
乔治·奥威尔1940年对《我的奋斗》的书评
George Orwell’s 1940 Review of Mein Kampf
这是奥威尔 1940 年对《我的奋斗》的书评，他没有简单谴责，而是认真分析希特勒的宣传手法为何奏效、又暴露了哪些思维特征。
小说与文学2022 · 499 分 · 545 评4 条写作要点编辑精选我们都是极客：尼尔·斯蒂芬森的文学作品
We are all nerds: The literary works of Neal Stephenson
这是一篇讨论 Neal Stephenson 科幻小说的文章，评论区读者围绕《Anathem》《钻石年代》《Snow Crash》等作品，聊世界构建、结尾处理和写作风格的变化。
小说与文学2022 · 307 分 · 220 评4 条写作要点编辑精选又一部我不会再去写的小说
Yet another novel I will no longer write
科幻作家 Charles Stross 讲述自己为何放弃一部已经构思好的小说：COVID-19 疫情让他的病毒灾难设定显得多余，现实给所有人上了一堂生动的疫情应对课。
小说与文学2020 · 304 分 · 169 评4 条写作要点编辑精选用图画写作：理查德·斯卡里与儿童文学的艺术
Writing in Pictures: Richard Scarry and the art of children's literature
这是《耶鲁评论》上漫画家 Chris Ware 写的文章，分析童书作家 Richard Scarry 如何用图画而不是文字来讲故事。
小说与文学2024 · 297 分 · 131 评4 条写作要点编辑精选如何写一部小说
How to Write a Novel
这篇来自 The Millions 的文章讨论写小说的两种路径——“计划派”（planners）与“即兴派”（pantsers，即“跟着感觉走、边写边编”）。
小说与文学2016 · 238 分 · 112 评4 条写作要点编辑精选