讲故事与叙事2017gwern.net
《你一生的故事》并不是一个时间旅行故事
‘Story Of Your Life’ Is Not A Time-Travel Story
导读
这篇讨论围绕《你一生的故事》的解读展开：它不是在讲时间旅行，而是在讲一种不同的时间感知如何改变自由意志、命运与选择的意义。对写作者来说，值得读的不是结论本身，而是它如何用高概念设定和叙事揭示来制造读者体验。
可以直接用的写作要点
- 01
把抽象设定落在人物的感知方式上：不是解释“同时性意识”，而是让人物因此做出不同于常人的选择。
- 02
高概念故事要提前想清读者会追问的漏洞，比如“知道未来为什么不改变”，并让这个前提本身成为主题。
- 03
重要的解释可以放在文本内部自然给出，但别让外部解读抢在读者体验之前。
- 04
用“接受而非改变”这类反直觉前提制造张力，比单纯堆砌科幻设定更有叙事力量。
HN 评论精选
自由意志与命运的纠结源于顺序意识；换一种同时性意识，知道未来不是宿命而是创造。
我认为故事试图表达的重要一点是：我们如何感知和反应自由意志与命运，很大程度上是拟人化的，因为我们拥有顺序意识。七肢桶拥有同时性意识，甚至不理解自由意志的概念。他们不为此困扰，因为那完全是一种不同的感知世界的方式。Ted Chiang 想触及的微妙差异是：人类认为知道未来意味着注定要执行一套编排；而七肢桶把知道未来视为创造未来。所以也许在人类心里，未来是我们正走向的一个地理特征，无法改变目的地令人不安；但在七肢桶心里，未来只是他们脑中知道的抽象概念，尚未存在，他们通过行动把它创造出来。
daemonk查看英文原文
I think one of the important points the story tries to make is the way we perceive/react to the idea of free-will vs destiny is very anthropomorphic because we have sequential consciousness. The heptapods have simultaneous consciousness and do not even understand the idea of free-will. They are not troubled by it because it is a purely different way of perceiving the world. The subtle difference Ted Chaing tried to get at is that humans think knowing the future means we are doomed to enact a choreography; but the hetpapods perceive knowing the future as creating the future. So maybe in a human's mind, we think of the future as a geographic feature that we are heading towards. And the inability to change where we go to is troubling. But in the heptapod's mind, the future is just an abstract concept they know in their minds, but do not exist yet; and they seek to create it by acting it out.
先读原作再读解读；提前知道解释会破坏叙事设计带来的阅读体验。
我建议大家直接读小说，而不是读这篇解读。小说不需要解读，发生的事相当直白，文本自己就把解释给出来了。但事先知道这些解释会破坏故事对读者玩的把戏，毁掉你的阅读体验。不是说我特别喜欢它。它是一个不太刺激的故事，包着一个不现实的伪物理点子。但我一向不喜欢这类故事——你可能会喜欢。
onli查看英文原文
I'd invite everyone to actually read the story instead of the linked interpretation. It does not need it, what happens is pretty straight-forward and the text gives its interpretation freely away by itself. But knowing those interpretations destroys the stunt the story is pulling on the reader, it will destroy your experience of reading it. Not that I particularly liked it. It is one not particularly exciting history wrapped around an unrealistic pseudo-physics idea. But I never like those type of stories – you might.
故事的前提是“知道未来仍不改变”；读者若拒绝接受这个前提，就会用别的解释绕开它。
同时性意识并不新颖，但对它的接受、拒绝改变未来，才是新颖的；人们忽略作者的这个前提，绞尽脑汁把它解释成别的东西，因为这让他们不安。一个人怎么能知道未来却不改变它？怎么能让坏事发生？其实这很禅。我不确定是否真是禅，但姑且把觉察、接受并认出每一刻的美与正确当作禅。这又回到光路径和最小化。当你拥有同时性觉察，也许你所有可能的路径和选项会自然坍缩成那个美丽的序列，你无需也不愿改变。至于这种同时性觉察如何与死亡共存，那是个挠头的问题。
jawon查看英文原文
The simultaneity of awareness is not novel, but the acceptance of it, the refusal to change the future, is, and people are ignoring this authorial premise and tying themselves into knots to explain it as something else because it unsettles them. How could someone know the future and not change it? How could someone let bad things happen? In fact, it's actually quite zen. Well, I'm not sure if it is really, but let's pretend being aware, accepting, and recognising the beauty/rightness in every moment is zen. And this ties back to the light path and minimisation. When you have that awareness of simultaneity maybe all your possible paths/options must naturally collapse into that beautiful sequence that you have no need or desire to alter. Now how this simultaneity of awareness coexists with mortality, well that is a head scratcher.
把同一文本读成模因病毒恐怖故事，说明高概念留白会引发激进的再解释。
《你一生的故事》是恐怖故事，讲一种模因病毒把人变成哲学僵尸。外星人被感染，遵循这个模因感染主角，主角又感染别人。除非记住未来比记住过去更难，否则意识不可能存在，因为记住未来依赖于对全宇宙状态的计算，而不只是你自己的大脑；这意味着“万物归一”的迷幻体验字面上是真的。Louise 不是人类，她对人类是生存威胁。剩下的人类反击的故事会有趣得多。你怎么打败一个敌人：越了解它就越自动输？我读过类似概念的故事。
mrob查看英文原文
"Story of Your Life" is horror, about a memetic virus that turns humans into p-zombies. The aliens are infected, and following the meme they infect the main character, who goes on to infect others. Consciousness is impossible unless remembering the future is more difficult than remembering the past, because remembering the future depends on calculations on the state of the entire universe instead of just your own brain, which implies that the psychedelic experience of "everything is one" is literally true. Louise is not human and she is an existential threat to humanity. The story of the remaining humans fighting back would be much more interesting. How can you defeat an enemy where learning too much about it makes you automatically lose? I read a story with a similar concept: https://archiveofourown.org/works/6178036
同类还值得读
Pixar in a Box：可汗学院的皮克斯讲故事课
Pixar in a Box – Khan Academy
这篇是 Khan Academy 与 Pixar 合作的“Pixar in a Box”项目介绍，用计算机图形和动画制作来讲解数学概念。
讲故事与叙事2015 · 753 分 · 65 评4 条写作要点编辑精选皮克斯的讲故事法则
Pixar's Rules of Storytelling (2013)
这是皮克斯动画工作室流传甚广的 22 条讲故事法则清单，从“从前有个___，每天___，有一天___”的骨架，到如何重写自己讨厌的作品。
讲故事与叙事2018 · 513 分 · 74 评4 条写作要点编辑精选皮克斯通过可汗学院提供免费在线讲故事课程
Pixar offers free online lessons in storytelling via Khan Academy
这篇报道介绍皮克斯与可汗学院合作的免费在线课程《讲故事的艺术》，把皮克斯内部的故事创作方法公开给普通学习者。
讲故事与叙事2017 · 503 分 · 93 评4 条写作要点编辑精选用皮克斯的故事公式说服投资人
Use Pixar's story formula to win over investors
这篇文章借用皮克斯的故事公式（以《海底总动员》为例）来示范如何给投资人讲创业路演故事：先讲目标、再讲障碍、最后讲改变。
讲故事与叙事2021 · 439 分 · 188 评4 条写作要点编辑精选贝索斯如何把叙事变成亚马逊的竞争优势
Jeff Bezos Turned Narrative into Amazon's Competitive Advantage
这篇讲杰夫·贝索斯如何把“六页叙事备忘录”变成亚马逊的管理与竞争优势：用可独立阅读的叙述性文档替代口头汇报和 PowerPoint。
讲故事与叙事2019 · 435 分 · 181 评4 条写作要点编辑精选