AI 与写作2022theregister.com
美国政府研发 AI 技术以识别匿名作者
US Government building AI tech to unmask anonymous writers
导读
这篇报道讲美国政府正在研发AI技术，用于识别匿名文本的作者，引发对匿名表达和言论自由的担忧。对写作者来说，它提醒我们：文风、用词和句法本身就是可被追踪的“指纹”，匿名写作并不等于绝对安全。
可以直接用的写作要点
- 01
你的词汇、句长、标点和结构习惯会形成可识别的文风指纹，写作时要意识到风格本身会暴露信息。
- 02
如果需要匿名表达，不能只换署名，还要有意识地改变用词、句式和行文节奏。
- 03
AI作者归属可能被刻意改写的文本误导，也可能造成误判，不应把技术判定当作事实。
- 04
写敏感观点前先评估平台、法律和现实风险，再决定表达方式与渠道。
HN 评论精选
作者识别技术可能引发自我审查，让人不敢留下书面表达。
如果你持有政府或未来政府可能不喜欢的信念，也许你根本不该在网上写任何东西，也不该发短信或写邮件。过去一年我一直在争论是否完全不以书面形式表达自己，这开始让人觉得很危险。
pessimizer查看英文原文
It's becoming a question that if you have any sort of beliefs that may not be looked upon kindly by this government or future governments, maybe you shouldn't be writing anything on the internet at all. Maybe you shouldn't be texting or writing emails, either. Over the past year, I've certainly been debating not expressing myself at all in writing. It's starting to feel very dangerous.
AI作者识别可被对抗性改写欺骗，从而产生误判和错误归责。
这会不会变成一种反模式：人类也可以故意微妙地改写文字来误导AI，造成错误归因。于是，被认定为异端文本X的作者可能是无辜的Y并因此受罚，而真正作者是A。
MrWiffles查看英文原文
I wonder if this will turn out to be something of an antipattern (for lack of a better term). The set of vocabulary in a given language is fairly limited by the human mind, enough such that it's relatively uniform enough that subtle alterations are achievable enough to the individual that they could conceivably, of their own volition, intentionally fool emergent AIs leading to false attribution. I mean, if the AI can alter the text subtly enough to fool other AIs, given the limited number of words known to other humans (which is kind of the point of speech - what use is a massive vocabulary if nobody else knows those words?), why couldn't humans do it too? So, here we have AIs erroneously pinning the author of heretical text X as human Y, thus triggering punishment Z. All the while, it was really written by bastard A, who is really a member of political party B: the opposition of human Y's party, the C's.
政府很可能早已具备作者识别能力，公开项目只是冰山一角。
我完全不相信情报界现在才开始研究这种可能性。这个想法几十年来都很明显，技术也大体够用；最近几年可能只是渐进改进。他们很可能早就有可用方案，因为系统不需要100%锁定某个人才算有用。
jerf查看英文原文
I find it absolutely, utterly, and completely implausible that the intelligence community just now started to research this possibility. It's been an obvious idea for decades now, and the tech has visibly obviously been roughly up to the task for decades as well. The last couple of years may have given an incremental improvement but it is completely implausible to me that they don't have workable solutions to this already. It's not like the system is useless to them until it 100% fingers exactly one person.
同类还值得读
我是肯尼亚人：不是我把 ChatGPT 写成了我，而是它写起来像我
I'm Kenyan. I don't write like ChatGPT, ChatGPT writes like me
一位肯尼亚作者反驳“我写得太像 AI”的指责：不是他写得像 ChatGPT，而是 ChatGPT 写得像他——那种平滑、无地域色彩、貌似中立的英语，本来就是殖民教育与精英阶层塑造…
AI 与写作2025 · 799 分 · 504 评4 条写作要点编辑精选使用 AI 助手完成论文写作任务会累积认知债务
Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task
这篇论文研究的是：在完成议论文写作任务时使用 AI 助手，是否会让写作者积累"认知债"——也就是把本应由自己承担的思考外包出去，短期省力、长期削弱写作与思考能力。
AI 与写作2025 · 391 分 · 426 评4 条写作要点编辑精选学生使用 ChatGPT 写作指南
A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT
这是 OpenAI 面向学生的一份写作指南，讲的是如何把 ChatGPT 用作写作过程中的辅助工具，而不是替你写完作业的"枪手"。
AI 与写作2024 · 323 分 · 309 评4 条写作要点编辑精选Grammarly，你也背叛了我？
Et Tu, Grammarly?
本次输入里只给了标题和链接，正文和评论都是空的，所以没法据实写出导读。
AI 与写作2025 · 279 分 · 74 评编辑精选用 GPT-3 进行创意小说写作
GPT-3 Creative Fiction
Gwern 的长文系统考察 GPT-3 在创意小说写作上的能力与边界：它能维持人设、写出讽刺腔调，也会整段复述训练数据里的歌词。
AI 与写作2020 · 234 分 · 97 评4 条写作要点编辑精选