小说与文学2013futurepundit.com
致灾难小说作家：别忘了自行车
Hey disaster novelists: Remember bicycles
导读
这篇 HN 讨论围绕“末日小说为什么总忘了自行车”展开，实际谈的是灾后设定里的交通、维修与日常技术供应链。对写作者来说，它提醒我们：世界崩坏不是一键回到中世纪，可信度往往藏在自行车零件、补胎胶水、眼镜这些具体小麻烦里。
可以直接用的写作要点
- 01
写灾难或崩坏设定时，把“技术降级”写成渐进过程：哪些日常物品先失效、哪些还能靠维修和替代零件撑一阵。
- 02
给交通工具安排真实代价：零件磨损、专用工具、耗材保质期、道路障碍和身体疲劳，别把它写成万能道具。
- 03
用小人物的具体麻烦替代空泛的“文明崩溃”，比如配眼镜、修车、过断桥，让设定有生活质感。
- 04
设计角色移动方式时同时考虑速度、暴露风险、载物能力与隐蔽性，让情节选择有因果，而不是只图方便。
HN 评论精选
末日后的自行车维护依赖专用工具和耗材供应链，并不是天然可靠的交通工具。
在“崩溃后的阿根廷”，我常参加一群无政府主义者办的免费修车坊；他们十二年前占领了崩溃中废弃的披萨店，把它改成图书馆、社区花园、缝纫坊和“自行车厨房”。由此我有几点体会：自行车坏得很快，尤其不是为骑行而造的商店车，以及用临时工具和劣质零件维修时；不少专用工具很难替代，比如飞轮拆卸器、截链器；内胎补漏需要硫化胶，经济崩溃后越来越难弄到，而且不能无限期保存，最终得用质量未知的化学品重建补胎用品供应。更一般地说，自行车像其他工业机械一样依赖维护体系。
kragen查看英文原文
Here in post-collapse Argentina, I semi-regularly attend a free bike repair workshop run by a bunch of anarchists who occupied a pizzeria abandoned in the collapse, twelve years ago. They turned it into a library, a community garden, a clothing workshop, and a bike kitchen. So I have some insights to offer: 1. It's remarkable how quickly bicycles can break down, especially when they're not made to be ridden (US department-store bikes, all Argentine bikes) and when you repair them with improvised tools and improvised or substandard components. 2. There are a fair number of specialized tools that you need for bike repair that are pretty hard to do without. You can maybe cut a cone wrench from a flattened spoon, and you can "press" out chavetas (cotters) with a hammer and chunk of steel instead of a cotter press, and you can true your rims on the bike if you have to, but how are you going to unscrew your freewheel without the right shape of freewheel extractor? Or break your chain without a chain breaker? 3. A bit further afield, you have to patch or replace your inner tubes when they spring leaks. But it's increasingly difficult to get working vulcanizing fluid for patching after the economy collapses; that shit doesn't have an indefinite shelf life. Ultimately you need to put together some kind of chemistry lab, using chemicals of unknown quality, in order to renew your supply of bike patch kits. 4. More generally, bicycles, like other industrial machinery, are allergic to entropy. The crucial resource needed to repack your wheel bearing balls isn't the steel to make the balls or the dead cow to grease them with; it's the knowledge about which balls are the right size, and which ones are already subtly cracked. Buy them in bulk and they cost a fraction of a cent. Install a ball of the wrong size and you could wreck your cones or your hub or even your body. So I think bicycles are an important part of post-apocalyptic transportation, but keeping bicycles running without an economy populated with specialized equipment, materials brought from far away, and people with specialized knowledge could be quite challenging indeed.
自行车在灾后未必便利，会受到道路状况、维护成本、安全风险和体力限制。
要看情况。很多灾难小说里道路被撞毁的车堵死，自行车看似方便，遇到断桥或堆满车祸残骸的路口就立刻成负担；道路垃圾和自然杂物也容易伤胎。维护资源不是零成本，潮湿地区车很快生锈，普通链条露天不加油大约一年就报废。按里程算，骑车比走路更危险；路坏、植被蔓延后风险更高。现代世界一次失误还能活，末日场景未必。骑车时人容易暴露，只能走主要发达道路，速度有限，容易中路边陷阱，遇袭得停车弃车；在“世界疯狂”的场景里，骑车越野的人比骑马或步行的人更容易成为目标。长距离骑行也很痛苦，尤其对不常骑的人，爬坡难，身体会以特别的方式受罪。
cdcox查看英文原文
It really depends. In a lot of disaster novels, things like roads are destroyed or unusable (packed with crashed in cars). While a bike might seem convenient at first, it quickly becomes an impossible burden at the first blown out bridge or packed highway intersection with a massive pileup. Similarly any 'road junk' from crashed cars or nature can easily damage tires. As others have mentioned, the resources to maintain bikes are not zero cost. Also, bikes rust in wetter areas fairly quickly if left outside/not maintained (your average chain is going to last ~ a year outside if not reoiled). Bikes, mile per mile are more dangerous than walking, this might be because of cars etc, but with cracking roads and overgrowth, the risk to riding a bike becomes higher than walking. A single screw up on a bike is survivable in the modern world, it is less so in a post-apocalyptic one. Bikes leave you vulnerable while travelling, you have to stick to main developed roads, you can only move so fast, you are easily taken out by a simple road trap. You have very little ability to 'take in surroundings' and you have to stop moving and abandon your bike to fight or hide. In a 'world gone mad' scenario someone on a bike moving overland is an easier target than someone on horse or on foot. Bicyling long distances sucks a lot, especially for people who don't do it a lot. It's brutal on the body, hard to cross anything with elevation, and hurts the body in unique ways. Your average person might give up cycling fairly quickly for this reason. Horses, at least, travel with you when riding on them sucks. Bikes don't work as well under non-ideal conditions. Heavy rain/snow/ice/elevation/heat all make bikes difficult to use or damage them. Skateboards solve a lot of these (as they are easily portable). But the risk factor gets higher. I'm not saying these items would be useless in a post-apocalyptic scenario. However, like most items, if someone wasn't extensively prepared to maintain and use them in a similar scenario, it's going to not work out for them except in the short term. (The same could be said about guns/cars/motorcycles).
更简单的机械结构在崩溃环境中往往更可靠。
自行车快递员和潮人会在末日后的未来有优势，因为固齿车的活动部件更少，故障率更低。
Tiktaalik查看英文原文
Bike couriers and hipsters will have an advantage in the post-apocalyptic future, as fixed gear bikes have fewer complex moving parts and break down less often.
末日写作常忽略眼镜这类日常工业品的供应链。
我觉得灾难小说家常以为技术等级一降、很多东西变成失传技术，社会就立刻回到中世纪，日常用品也瞬间消失或不可用。可我想象崩溃时会担心一些具体问题，比如谁来给我换眼镜？我没在灾难小说里见过人们为找眼镜发愁，但眼镜制造商大概不会剩下多少。
speeder查看英文原文
I have the impression that disaster novelists think that as our technology level drop and lots of stuff become lost technology, society become something like medieval era instantly, with several common day use objects instantly disappearing or becoming unusable... Yet, when I think about possible collapse I do worry about some interesting things, like, who will replace my glasses? I never heard in a disaster novel of people having problem to find glasses, yet I believe glasses manufacturers will not be much...
同类还值得读
乔治·奥威尔1940年对《我的奋斗》的书评
George Orwell’s 1940 Review of Mein Kampf
这是奥威尔 1940 年对《我的奋斗》的书评，他没有简单谴责，而是认真分析希特勒的宣传手法为何奏效、又暴露了哪些思维特征。
小说与文学2022 · 499 分 · 545 评4 条写作要点编辑精选我们都是极客：尼尔·斯蒂芬森的文学作品
We are all nerds: The literary works of Neal Stephenson
这是一篇讨论 Neal Stephenson 科幻小说的文章，评论区读者围绕《Anathem》《钻石年代》《Snow Crash》等作品，聊世界构建、结尾处理和写作风格的变化。
小说与文学2022 · 307 分 · 220 评4 条写作要点编辑精选又一部我不会再去写的小说
Yet another novel I will no longer write
科幻作家 Charles Stross 讲述自己为何放弃一部已经构思好的小说：COVID-19 疫情让他的病毒灾难设定显得多余，现实给所有人上了一堂生动的疫情应对课。
小说与文学2020 · 304 分 · 169 评4 条写作要点编辑精选用图画写作：理查德·斯卡里与儿童文学的艺术
Writing in Pictures: Richard Scarry and the art of children's literature
这是《耶鲁评论》上漫画家 Chris Ware 写的文章，分析童书作家 Richard Scarry 如何用图画而不是文字来讲故事。
小说与文学2024 · 297 分 · 131 评4 条写作要点编辑精选如何写一部小说
How to Write a Novel
这篇来自 The Millions 的文章讨论写小说的两种路径——“计划派”（planners）与“即兴派”（pantsers，即“跟着感觉走、边写边编”）。
小说与文学2016 · 238 分 · 112 评4 条写作要点编辑精选