HN 写作课

工程师们二十年里聊过的写作。

工程师、作家、编辑和创业者在 Hacker News 上聊了二十年“怎么写”:怎么写得清楚、怎么讲好一个故事、技术文档怎么写、小说和出版是怎么回事。这里把其中关于写作与讲故事的帖子挑出来,配上中文导读、可以直接用的写作要点和评论翻译。

从必读开始
  • 2,600+篇关于写作的 HN 讨论

Writing tips

写作锦囊

正在抽一条写作要点…

Essential

必读 30 篇

在讨论库里看全部精选

编辑精选里 HN 讨论最热的 30 篇,每篇都有中文导读和写作要点。

  1. 正在载入…

Archive

讨论库

按发帖年份分布,点柱子筛选。

排序

    About

    这些讨论是怎么挑出来的

    1. 01

      从全量里捞

      读取 Hacker News 自 2006 年以来的全部帖子,用关键词先捞出 40 分以上、可能和写作有关的约 1.1 万篇。

    2. 02

      只留真正讲写作的

      由 AI 逐条判断是否和写作、讲故事、文风、出版有实质关系,剔除“写代码”“编辑器”这类字面撞车,并分进十个类别。

    3. 03

      提炼可用的要点

      为值得读的帖子写中文导读,提炼 2-4 条可以直接用到自己写作里的要点,并精选翻译 HN 高赞评论。内容由 AI 生成,可能有误。

    AI 与写作2014singularityhub.com

    更多新闻正由机器人撰写

    More News Is Being Written By Robots

    阅读原文 HN 讨论
    97HN 得分
    77条评论
    4条写作要点

    导读

    文章讨论自动化写作已经进入新闻生产:地震、体育比分、彩票结果等模板化内容可由脚本把原始数据转成自然语言报道。对写作者而言,真正值得学习的不是“填模板”,而是判断数据中什么最重要、围绕这个发现组织叙事;同时也要警惕自动发布通稿会削弱记者的追问和核实。

    关键词 自动化写作数据新闻新闻叙事模板化写作

    可以直接用的写作要点

    1. 01

      把高度公式化的事实短讯交给脚本处理,省下时间做分析、采访和更重要的写作。

    2. 02

      写数据类报道时,先找出对读者最重要的点并放进导语,而不是把原始数据直接堆给读者。

    3. 03

      机器容易写清“谁赢了、比分多少”,难写出“首次无安打”这类有语境和意义判断的叙事;写作要解释重要性。

    4. 04

      如果自动化只是把来源通稿搬到新闻页,写作者更应保留质疑、核实和追问的空间。

    HN 评论精选

    自动化写作的价值在分析和提炼重点,而不是套模板填数据。

    我以前在日报做网络编辑,每天要写彩票结果和海滩冲浪条件短讯。这些内容极其公式化,我就写了按键脚本抓取、解析数据并生成报道,省下时间做更重要的事。有人说为什么不直接显示原始数据?因为要替读者省去分析数据的麻烦。比如中奖号码脚本会列出哪些州有人中奖;如果只吐原始数据,读者可能漏掉中奖者来自本州,而生成报道会把这放导语。Narrative Science的Quill魔力也不在“疯狂填词”式填空,而在分析数据、找出最重要部分并围绕它构建故事。机器人写“老虎队昨天1比0胜狼队,John Johnson本垒打”不难;难的是写出“Tom Thompson投出生涯首个无安打”这类有意义的叙事。

    jawns查看英文原文

    I used to work as a web editor at a daily newspaper. One of my daily responsibilities was to write and post short blurbs about lottery results and beach surf conditions. They both were extremely formulaic, so I wrote push-button scripts that would fetch the data, parse it, and generate stories. Saved me time, which I used to do other, more important things. Some people have said, "Why not just display the raw data?" Well, to save you the trouble of having to analyze the data. For instance, suppose I've written a Powerball results script that lists the winning numbers, along with which states had winners. If I'm just spitting out the raw data, then people might miss the fact that one of the winners was from our state -- whereas if I'm generating a story, I'm going to make that the lede. Similarly, the magic of a company like Narrative Science and its Quill service is not in taking a ton of data and filling in a bunch of blanks with the values, Mad Libs style. It's in analyzing the data and figuring out what the most important parts are, and constructing a story around those findings. In other words, it's not hard for a bot to write, "The Tigers played the Wolves yesterday. The Tigers won 1-0. The Tigers' John Johnson scored a home run." It's more difficult to write, "The Tigers' Tom Thompson pitched the first no-hitter of his career yesterday in a 1-0 game against the Wolves. Remarkably, the Wolves' pitcher, Dobbie Dobson, was moments away from forcing the game into extra innings with his own no-hitter, when, in the ninth inning with two outs and two strikes on the board, the Tigers' John Johnson hit a home run." (I'm not a baseball writer, so I'm probably bungling it, but you get the point.)

    文章介绍自动化新闻工具及其激进预测,提醒读者区分机器生成与人类写作。

    摘要:芝加哥创业公司Narrative Science开发脚本,把地震数据、网站分析等原始数据流转成可读的自然语言报告。一些新闻机构已用它快速、廉价地生成地震和少棒联盟报道。创始人Kristian Hammond有大想法:“2017年拿普利策奖”“2030年90%的新闻由机器人写”。本摘要由人类所写,仅此说明。

    Pitarou查看英文原文

    TL;DR A Chicago startup called Narrative Science makes scripts that turn raw data feeds such as seismological data or website analytics into accessible natural language reports. Some news outlets are already using them to get out earthquake and Little Leagues baseball reports quickly and cheaply. The founder, Kristian Hammond, has big ideas. "Pulitzer Prize by 2017." "90% of news written by bots in 2030." This TL;DR was written by a human. Just saying.

    自动化通稿会消解记者追问和核实,不能等同于新闻。

    如果写作者再也不必写五十词的地震简讯,大概没多少人会抱怨,短而干巴巴的信息稿交给机器人更好。但这套逻辑推下去,就可以替换成“总统新闻简报”“新闻泄露”“宣战公告”。让机器代写以加快发布,前提是来源的准确性在公开前已被假定,只要来源按公式提交稿件就行。这消除了可能提出复杂问题的记者能动性,所以我不认为它算新闻或新闻业;它只是把来源的话搬到新闻机构首页。既然如此,何必把通稿包装成独特内容?直接逐字刊登通稿并注明来源。

    seanccox查看英文原文

    "If a writer never had to compose a fifty word earthquake report again—few would complain. Better to leave the short, dry, purely informational articles to the bots." The logical extension of this software is to replace the phrase 'earthquake report'. "If a writer never had to compose a fifty word Presidential press brief again—few would complain." "If a writer never had to compose a fifty word news leak again—few would complain." "If a writer never had to compose a fifty word announcement of a declaration of war again—few would complain." Let the machine do the writing to expedite publishing, because the accuracy of the source is assumed before the information is even shared publicly, provided the source submits releases in a formulaic manner. This removes the agency of humans that might ask complicated questions (journalists) – so I don't believe it qualifies as news or journalism, at all. This just helps move the words of the source to the front page of a news agency. Why dress up the release as unique content at all? Just print the damn press release word for word and cite the source.

    新闻的下一波竞争力在于有见识、有观点的分析,而非纯客观信息搬运。

    多数新闻故事已经被人类压缩到140字符以内。新闻业的下一个前沿,是来自多视角的、有见识且有观点的分析大爆发。体育里有Grantland、Deadspin、538、Baseball Prospectus,政治里有Vox、538、Politico,科技里有Thompson、Evans、Gruber等。科技领先是因为前沿人群常对科技感兴趣,我相信这是整个新闻业走向的领先指标:一场有思考、分析性、但非纯客观写作的“寒武纪大爆发”。

    mlchild查看英文原文

    Most news stories are already being boiled down to < 140 characters by humans. The next frontier in journalism is an explosion in informed, opinionated analysis from multiple perspectives. We're seeing this in sports (Grantland, Deadspin, 538, Baseball Prospectus), politics (Vox.com/Ezra Klein, 538 again, Politico), and tech (Thompson, Evans, Gruber, The Wirecutter, Anandtech, MG/Dixon/Wilson/Suster/Andreessen/Horowitz/etc/yesIleftamillionpeopleout). Tech leads the way because those on the cutting edge are often interested in tech, and I believe it's a solid leading indicator of where all journalism is headed—a 'Cambrian explosion' of thoughtful, analytic, but not purely objective writing.

    同类还值得读

    1. 我是肯尼亚人:不是我把 ChatGPT 写成了我,而是它写起来像我

      I'm Kenyan. I don't write like ChatGPT, ChatGPT writes like me

      一位肯尼亚作者反驳“我写得太像 AI”的指责:不是他写得像 ChatGPT,而是 ChatGPT 写得像他——那种平滑、无地域色彩、貌似中立的英语,本来就是殖民教育与精英阶层塑造…

      AI 与写作2025 · 799 分 · 504 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    2. 使用 AI 助手完成论文写作任务会累积认知债务

      Accumulation of cognitive debt when using an AI assistant for essay writing task

      这篇论文研究的是:在完成议论文写作任务时使用 AI 助手,是否会让写作者积累"认知债"——也就是把本应由自己承担的思考外包出去,短期省力、长期削弱写作与思考能力。

      AI 与写作2025 · 391 分 · 426 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    3. 学生使用 ChatGPT 写作指南

      A Student's Guide to Writing with ChatGPT

      这是 OpenAI 面向学生的一份写作指南,讲的是如何把 ChatGPT 用作写作过程中的辅助工具,而不是替你写完作业的"枪手"。

      AI 与写作2024 · 323 分 · 309 评4 条写作要点编辑精选
    4. Grammarly,你也背叛了我?

      Et Tu, Grammarly?

      本次输入里只给了标题和链接,正文和评论都是空的,所以没法据实写出导读。

      AI 与写作2025 · 279 分 · 74 评编辑精选
    5. 用 GPT-3 进行创意小说写作

      GPT-3 Creative Fiction

      Gwern 的长文系统考察 GPT-3 在创意小说写作上的能力与边界:它能维持人设、写出讽刺腔调,也会整段复述训练数据里的歌词。

      AI 与写作2020 · 234 分 · 97 评4 条写作要点编辑精选

    打赏支持

    打赏二维码

    觉得有用,请作者喝杯咖啡。

    WeChat

    关注向阳乔木

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」

    微信公众号「向阳乔木推荐看」二维码

    微信扫一扫;在微信里打开本页时,长按二维码识别。