讲故事与叙事2015ericsink.com
浏览器大战回忆录（2003）
Memoirs from the Browser Wars (2003)
导读
这是 Eric Sink 写于 2003 年的第一人称回忆录，讲述他所在的 Spyglass 小团队在 1990 年代浏览器大战中被 Netscape 和微软千人大军碾压的经历。对写作者的价值在于：它示范了如何用个人视角、具体数字和他人引语，把一段宏大的行业史写成有现场感、有幽默感的私人叙事。
可以直接用的写作要点
- 01
用一个具体数字（对方 1000 人 vs 自己 20 人）代替“实力悬殊”这类抽象形容，读者立刻有体感。
- 02
把宏大历史落到“我”的所见所感，第一人称的局限反而让叙事更可信、更有人味。
- 03
引用同事的原话（如“我们打败了所有没在花费上超过我们五倍的人”）来收束段落，比自己总结更有力。
- 04
用自嘲和轻松的括号注释（如“生活有时不公平 :-)”）调节沉重话题的语调。
HN 评论精选
一个具体数字比任何形容都更能制造悬念和冲击力。
这篇文章读起来很吸引人，但有一句话让我停住了：“Scott 告诉我 IE 团队有 1000 多人。”那一千号人到底在干什么？
smcl查看英文原文
This is a fascinating read, but this one line stuck out to me: > Scott told me that the IE team had over 1,000 people What on earth could they possibly have had those thousand people doing?
市场领先者定义标准、后来者被迫“兼容”的循环反复上演，是科技叙事里的经典母题。
（评论者引述回忆录）Netscape 跑得更快、功能领先还免费，成了评判所有浏览器的标准；我们的浏览器只要跟它渲染得不完全一样就被当成 bug，尽管我们本来就是按“标准”写的——生活有时不公平。评论者补充：所有非市场领先者都有这种感受，而领先者已经换过好几轮。文中那个 1000 人是 Spyglass 团队的 50 倍，几乎等于 Netscape 全公司的人数；Tim Krauskopf 后来说“我们打败了所有没在花费上超过我们五倍的人”。这基本就是 Chrome 对竞争做的事。
rockdoe查看英文原文
But Netscape was running at a much faster pace. They got ahead of us on features and they began to give their browser away at no cost to end users. This made Netscape the standard by which all other browsers were judged. If our browser didn't render something exactly like Netscape, it was considered a bug. I hated fixing our browser to make it bug-compatible with Netscape even though we had already coded it to "the standard". Life's not fair sometimes. :-) Everyone who's not the current marketshare leader goes through this feeling. And it's changed quite a few times. I was stunned. That was 50 times the size of the Spyglass browser team. It was almost as many people as Netscape had in their whole company. I could have written the rest of the history of web browsers on that day -- no other outcomes were possible....Looking back on the browser wars, Tim Krauskopf remarked that we had beaten everybody who didn't outspend us by a factor of five. :-) Pretty much describes what Chrome did to the competition.
用“假如历史不同”的想象为叙事增添趣味和余味。
我好奇的一点是，NCSA Mosaic 之后，“Mosaic”一度成了浏览器的通称——于是有了 Netscape Mosaic 和 Spyglass Mosaic。NCSA 很快主张了自己的名字，但想想另一个平行宇宙里我们用着 Mosaic Safari 和 Google Mosaic，会很有趣 :)
kalleboo查看英文原文
One thing I find curious is how in the early days right after NCSA Mosaic, "Mosaic" became a generic term for browsers - We got Netscape Mosaic and Spyglass Mosaic. NCSA quickly asserted their name, but it would be interesting how we could have had an alternative universe where we were using Mosaic Safari and Google Mosaic :)
同类还值得读
Pixar in a Box：可汗学院的皮克斯讲故事课
Pixar in a Box – Khan Academy
这篇是 Khan Academy 与 Pixar 合作的“Pixar in a Box”项目介绍，用计算机图形和动画制作来讲解数学概念。
讲故事与叙事2015 · 753 分 · 65 评4 条写作要点编辑精选皮克斯的讲故事法则
Pixar's Rules of Storytelling (2013)
这是皮克斯动画工作室流传甚广的 22 条讲故事法则清单，从“从前有个___，每天___，有一天___”的骨架，到如何重写自己讨厌的作品。
讲故事与叙事2018 · 513 分 · 74 评4 条写作要点编辑精选皮克斯通过可汗学院提供免费在线讲故事课程
Pixar offers free online lessons in storytelling via Khan Academy
这篇报道介绍皮克斯与可汗学院合作的免费在线课程《讲故事的艺术》，把皮克斯内部的故事创作方法公开给普通学习者。
讲故事与叙事2017 · 503 分 · 93 评4 条写作要点编辑精选用皮克斯的故事公式说服投资人
Use Pixar's story formula to win over investors
这篇文章借用皮克斯的故事公式（以《海底总动员》为例）来示范如何给投资人讲创业路演故事：先讲目标、再讲障碍、最后讲改变。
讲故事与叙事2021 · 439 分 · 188 评4 条写作要点编辑精选贝索斯如何把叙事变成亚马逊的竞争优势
Jeff Bezos Turned Narrative into Amazon's Competitive Advantage
这篇讲杰夫·贝索斯如何把“六页叙事备忘录”变成亚马逊的管理与竞争优势：用可独立阅读的叙述性文档替代口头汇报和 PowerPoint。
讲故事与叙事2019 · 435 分 · 181 评4 条写作要点编辑精选