讲故事与叙事2013cs.txstate.edu
写给工程师的一个短篇故事
A Short Story for Engineers
导读
这是一则流传很广的工程师寓言：一条生产线上的空肥皂盒难住了昂贵的自动化检测系统，最后靠一台电风扇就解决了。故事本身示范了用“复杂昂贵”与“简单巧妙”的对照来讲道理，但评论里更有意思的是对这种故事的反省：它到底是在促使我们反思，还是只让我们为自己站在“聪明人”一边而暗自得意。对写作者来说，这是关于寓言式叙事、反转结构与说服伦理的好案例。
可以直接用的写作要点
- 01
用“昂贵复杂”与“廉价简单”的双线对照搭建叙事张力，让观点在对比中自然浮现，而不是由作者直接说出。
- 02
如果要在结尾用反转来点题，别在开头就预告结论；先让读者代入，再动摇他们，冲击力才成立。
- 03
专业故事要靠具体细节落地：八百万美元的预算、每名技术员十五分钟、二十美元的备件，数字比形容词更有说服力。
- 04
写寓言时要警惕“自我恭维”的副作用，可以在结尾留下让读者不安的问题：如果换作我，我会站在哪一边？
HN 评论精选
这类“简单战胜复杂”的笑话只是在让读者自我恭维，而非促人反思。
我喜欢这类笑话所强化的价值观，也就是简单、创造力、主动，而不是复杂、昂贵、官僚；但我怀疑它们在工程文化里是否真起正面作用。我们讲这些笑话，是为了保持警觉、让自己变得更好吗？我们真的会忘记简单比复杂好吗？我们造出过度设计的复杂系统，是因为忘了简单更好吗？我不这么认为。我认为我们讲这些笑话，是为了把好工程和坏工程对照，并为自己站在正确一边而自我祝贺。好的笑话会先引你入套、让你有点自得，然后抽掉你脚下的地毯。这个笑话从一开始就预告了笑点：先鼓励自得，再证实自得。健康的笑话会让我们不安：我们究竟会不会站在正确一边？我们是否真的在践行自己的价值观？这个笑话让我们安心，说问题在于别人的价值观；而它这样做，恰恰助长了它自己所嘲弄的那种自满。
dkarl查看英文原文
I like the values that jokes like this reinforce (simplicity, creativity, and proactivity versus complexity, expense, and bureaucracy) but I wonder if they serve a positive purpose in engineering culture. Do we tell these jokes to keep ourselves on our toes, to make ourselves better? Are we really in danger of forgetting which is better, simplicity or complexity? When we create complex and over-engineered systems, is it because we forget that simplicity is better? I don't think we do. I think we tell ourselves these jokes to contrast good engineering with bad engineering and to congratulate ourselves for being on the right side. A good joke would lead you down the garden path, encourage a bit of smugness and then rip the rug out from under you. This joke telegraphs the punch line from the start: it encourages smugness and then vindicates it. A healthy joke would make us uncomfortable about whether we would have been on the right side, whether we are doing a good job of living up to our values. This joke reassures us that the problem is other people's values, and by doing so, it promotes exactly the kind of complacency that it makes fun of.
昂贵项目本身有价值，而“麻烦”会逼出一线人员的巧思；观察使用者是最好的诊断。
在工厂工作几年后我的看法变了，现在我认为那个风扇方案恐怕本来就需要那个八百万美元的项目。没有那个项目，操作员不会感到不便，也不会那么快达成目标。还要记住，那个项目是值得的，它带来了投资回报。理想情况下，先找到简单方案会省下一大笔钱，但工业界靠的是多年间持续、微小、渐进的变化。而想出风扇这种妙招需要非常特别的心态！相反，应该为那位操作员鼓掌，因为他让别的工厂不必再买那么贵的系统了。补充一点：永远不要低估“给操作员添麻烦”的效用。他们会找出最聪明、最巧妙、最便宜的变通办法。观察操作员是最好的诊断工具。当你在机器上看到夹钳或胶带，你就知道下一步该改进什么。
HCIdivision17查看英文原文
My opinion has shifted over the last few years working in plants, and I've now settled on the idea that the fan solution probably needed the eight million dollar project. Without the project, the operator would not have been inconvenienced, nor would they have achieved their goals as soon. Also remember that the project was worth it - it was returning on the investment. Ideally the simple solution would have been found first for a massive windfall of savings, but industry runs on constant, small, incremental changes over many years. And it takes a very special mindset to invent awesome hacks like the fan trick! The operator should instead be applauded for making it so no other plant needs to buy such an expensive system! Edit: also, never underestimate the utility of inconveniencing operators. They will find the most brilliant, clever, and cheap hacks to solve problems. Watching operators is the best diagnostic tool available. When you see a c-clamp or duct tape on the machine, you know exactly what needs workin' on next!
现实工厂里用压缩空气吹走坏件本就是常规做法，故事低估了一线的日常创造力。
这是一个关于过度设计和跳出框寻找最简方案的可爱故事，但任何有制造业经验的人都能告诉你，许多工厂每台机器旁都有压缩空气管线，经常用来把坏零件从传送带或送料轨道上吹走。美国制造工厂其实充满极大的创造力和务实精神。在外人看来，它们可能吵闹、脏乱、无序，但里面的工程师日常处理的，是“如何用备件、废金属和二十美元预算，在坏零件滚下生产线前把它们拦下来”这类问题。我见过一些惊人的鲁布·戈德堡式送料系统，性能超过昂贵的激光、光学或分流门装置。
wikwocket查看英文原文
This is a cute story about over-engineering and thinking outside the box to find the simplest solution, but anyone with manufacturing experience can tell you that many factories have compressed air lines at each machine, and frequently use it to blow bad parts off off of a conveyor/feed rail. American manufacturing factories are actually homes to tremendous ingenuity and practicality. To an outsider they may seem loud, dirty, and disorganized, but the engineers inside routinely deal with issues like "how can we catch bad parts before they roll off the line, using spare parts, scrap metal, and a $20 budget?" I have seen some amazing Rube Goldberg feeding systems that can outperform expensive laser/optical/diverter gate packages.
巨大收益有时来自极小的改动，而体制内的人反而会抵制它。
好故事，而且适用范围很广。我曾为一家《财富》50强公司做一个非常大的流程与技术改进项目。其中关键一环是现场技术人员的排程系统。经过100多个“努力年”（别问！）我们把它开发和测试完成，实现了每名技术人员十五分钟的生产率提升，足以证明巨额开支合理。然后我们发现，让他们每周而不是每晚重启笔记本电脑，收益能翻倍，尽管技术架构师们强烈反对。
mathattack查看英文原文
Great story, and widely applicable. I worked on a very large process and technology improvement program for a Fortune 50 company. One critical piece of the project was a scheduling system for field technicians. After 100+ effort years (don't ask!) we got it developed and tested, and it achieved the 15 minutes per technician productivity improvement, justifying the massive expense. We then found that we could double the benefit by having them reboot their laptops weekly instead of nightly. (Though the technology architects screamed bloody murder)
同类还值得读
Pixar in a Box：可汗学院的皮克斯讲故事课
Pixar in a Box – Khan Academy
这篇是 Khan Academy 与 Pixar 合作的“Pixar in a Box”项目介绍，用计算机图形和动画制作来讲解数学概念。
讲故事与叙事2015 · 753 分 · 65 评4 条写作要点编辑精选皮克斯的讲故事法则
Pixar's Rules of Storytelling (2013)
这是皮克斯动画工作室流传甚广的 22 条讲故事法则清单，从“从前有个___，每天___，有一天___”的骨架，到如何重写自己讨厌的作品。
讲故事与叙事2018 · 513 分 · 74 评4 条写作要点编辑精选皮克斯通过可汗学院提供免费在线讲故事课程
Pixar offers free online lessons in storytelling via Khan Academy
这篇报道介绍皮克斯与可汗学院合作的免费在线课程《讲故事的艺术》，把皮克斯内部的故事创作方法公开给普通学习者。
讲故事与叙事2017 · 503 分 · 93 评4 条写作要点编辑精选用皮克斯的故事公式说服投资人
Use Pixar's story formula to win over investors
这篇文章借用皮克斯的故事公式（以《海底总动员》为例）来示范如何给投资人讲创业路演故事：先讲目标、再讲障碍、最后讲改变。
讲故事与叙事2021 · 439 分 · 188 评4 条写作要点编辑精选贝索斯如何把叙事变成亚马逊的竞争优势
Jeff Bezos Turned Narrative into Amazon's Competitive Advantage
这篇讲杰夫·贝索斯如何把“六页叙事备忘录”变成亚马逊的管理与竞争优势：用可独立阅读的叙述性文档替代口头汇报和 PowerPoint。
讲故事与叙事2019 · 435 分 · 181 评4 条写作要点编辑精选